Generation of a large project at once - an architectural trap
Next step
Open the bot or continue inside this section.
Article -> plan in AI
Paste this article URL into any AI and get an implementation plan for your project.
Read this article: https://vibecode.morecil.ru/en/arhiv/%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D1%81%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%83-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0--%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0/
Work in my current project context.
Create an implementation plan for this stack:
1) what to change
2) which files to edit
3) risks and typical mistakes
4) how to verify everything works
If there are options, provide "quick" and "production-ready". How to use
- Copy this prompt and send it to your AI chat.
- Attach your project or open the repository folder in the AI tool.
- Ask for file-level changes, risks, and a quick verification checklist.
When you ask an AI to generate a large project at once, you get not a basis, but an illusion of readiness. The code appears quickly, but understanding does not appear at all, and at some point the project begins to fall apart in your hands.
As usual, the idea arises
At some point, it feels like small steps are too slow. You've seen the AI write code, you've seen examples of projects, and the logical thought in your head is, since it can write code, why not ask it to do the whole project right away. App, bot, service - it doesn't matter. I want to see “something real” right away.
AI readily responds to such a request. It creates folder structure, files, configurations, sometimes even launch instructions. Everything looks solid. It feels like halfway through, even though you’ve done almost nothing.
Why everything seems right at this stage
A large generated project makes a strong impression. Lots of files, familiar words, neat structure. It seems that the architecture already exists, and now it remains only “a little bit to understand”.
The problem is that this structure came not from your understanding, but from someone else's logic. You don't know why the project works this way. Why is there one file instead of two? Why is logic divided in this way? You see the result, but not the path that led to it.
Where the real trap appears
The trap doesn't work right away. It even works at first. But at some point you want to change something. Add a new function, remove excess, correct behavior. Suddenly you don’t know where to go.
There are many files, the names seem to be meaningful, but the connections between them are not obvious. You start opening the code, reading, going back, and quickly catch yourself feeling like you're looking at someone else's house without a plan. You can walk around the rooms, but it is unclear where the load-bearing walls are.
Why AI is not to blame
It is important to understand that this is not an AI error. He did exactly what he was asked to do. He put together a project that looks like a "big project." But architecture is not an exterior. It's an understanding of why the system works the way it does.
AI can't give you that understanding in one answer. It only happens when you go from a simple idea to a complication, step by step. When this path is missed, architecture remains a decoration.
What a Healthier Way Looks Like
Architecture does not emerge when you see the entire project, but when the project grows out of a small piece of work. When there is one function first, then there is a second, then there is a connection between them, and then there is a need for structure.
In this process, AI helps much better. He doesn’t build you a whole house, he helps you lay the next brick when you understand why you need it.